Skip to main content

Public's Reaction to Public Schemes

If unemployment increases along with the youth’s population, crime will naturally increase. It will destabilize the peace and harmony of a nation. So it is in the interest of the tax payers to keep rate of unemployment minimum: By Jitendra Rajaram 


In my village I noticed that whatever people talk or think about any public scheme is largely pessimistic. They're the victim of negative publicity of the schemes. Every new scheme comes with lots of negative notions. Ground level executive believes that since people at the upper level are going to earn large sum unethically, they too should find ways to earn from it. They never accept that government will ever implement any schemes for the welfare of the people. I believe government should advertise the intention, willingness and commitment of any ambitious schemes enthusiastically. It will garner greater commitment, accountability and responsibility among the people associated and benefited with it.

It’s evident that from planning level to application level everyone is quite convinced to take personal benefits with any and every schemes running. This leads to a general opinion that schemes are made to benefit government people personally and it has no any welfare attributes. Surveys are widely available on public websites in which pessimism in execution at every level is visible.

Public Administration must have to find a solution of this problem. It will reduce the cost of program by increasing the efficiency. As per a reputed Magazine Gram Panchayats are overloaded. They roughly handle 70 accounts and 150 schemes and physical area of operation varies from 5Kms to 50Kms. It naturally implies that man power involved in carrying these schemes are forced to work unwillingly. No wonder these people aren’t capable of taking up such a complex work. Howsoever great are training programs.

Some Solutions are suggested
Like MGNREGA in which employment for unskilled labors are provided, government should recruit skilled and semi skilled people in villages to implement various schemes. This workforce will be other than teaching, nursing and paramedical. This will increase employment and reduce execution errors.

In projects like public surveys and census... school and college students should be deployed with encouraging remuneration and certificate of participation. This will engage them in practical learning and boost confidence.

Professional graduates like MBAs, BTechs and Medical should be motivated to take up works in rural or semi rural places. This will optimize the check and balance of program’s implication. This workforce is highly skilled to utilize high tech machinery of the under construction government administration’s infrastructure. It also will reduce the head responsibility of higher officers.

Gram Panchayats should work as administrators and supervisors not as clerks or executives. It will ensure efficient execution of programs

Criticism of the solutions suggested
One of the most oblivious criticisms is the cost of increased manpower.

TAX payers are paying taxes for peaceful living. If unemployment increases along with the youth’s population, crime will naturally increase. It will destabilize the peace and harmony of a nation. So it is in the interest of the tax payers to keep rate of unemployment minimum

Taxation department is able to collect 41% of total income taxes. Almost 90% of Indian businessmen big or small defaults in tax payment. Cost of tax recovery is way higher than any other nation of the world. Inefficient delegation of public programs is also mounting cost. Above suggested solutions will reduce this burden.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My letter to Mr. Chetan Bhagat

Sent to bhakti@chetanbhagat.com  as on 26, August 2013, In response to Mr. Bhagat's Article  Sunday Times, 25th August 2013, Indore Edition  Dear Mr. Bhagat, This is awful that a person of your stature is out rightly supporting a cult publicly. Knowing that millions of youth will be influenced by your opinion, you should have behaved more responsibly in public. We know media is sold to Modi and international big brothers want to use Modi cult by giving rest to UPA for at least a term. For international diplomacy BJP & Congress are all alike. While these two national parties will keep wrestling over their core ideologies of being Hindu Nationalists & Secular Nationalists, they will always settle on the economic policies favoring to international markets. They will be ready to provide free flow accessibility of Indian consumers & natural resources to foreign corporate giants. It is sadly termed as a real growth of India. Because if foreign inve...

The Cusp of Democracy & Autocracy

A country where earning Rs.18 a day tags you not poor, Election Commission spends Rs.73 per voter to conduct the general election  - Jitendra Rajaram "O ut of 123 democratic countries in the world, not a single country is 100% democratic. Not a single democracy conducts 100% impartial election. In India where 36% population lives in a $1 a day, the cost of election is more than $1 a vote. The irony doesn't end here! The political parties conesting in such elections have spent more $13 to woo every single elector in 2019 General Election of India. Owing the amount of money spent, should we call it a democracy or plutocracy? Nic Cheeseman and Brian Klass wrote in the first page of their book “How to Rig an Election” with a statement “The greatest political paradox of our time is this: there are more elections than ever before, and yet the world is becoming less democratic”. The book written by Nic Cheeseman & Brian Klass, Harper Collins Publication | Yale Univers...

Theocracy Strengthens Aristocracy and Defies Democracy.

"It was easy in ancient time for religions to progress for two reasons. One every civilization was miles apart from every other civilization" - Jitendra Rajaram   "T he mixture of fear and weakness among the people who surrenders to feudalism has enlarged the idea of God-ism. The theory first coined by the power hungry ruling class and their serfs. People, when united, are the ultimate power. The select few (ruling class) always wanted to control this power of people. The control of power is all about channelizing the energy it holds. This is how the need of an imaginary superpower evolved. A superpower which can channelize the energy of united people. Ruling class invented this imaginary power to tame the real power (i.e. people).  Had I ONLY been introduced to anyone of Brahma or Allah or Moses or Christ during my childhood I would have easily believed upon god. The creators of God (i.e. Ruling Class) have devised so circumventing methods to establish...