Skip to main content

Tolerance of Freedom

Tolerance of Freedom 

Any compromised means to achieve freedom should not be tolerated... because more than right, freedom is a responsibility. If irresponsibility is tolerated than freedom cannot be sustained.


Ruling Class always have at least one unbeatable reasoning to justify them being the ruler. They always established this reasoning among the educated fraternity that they rule because those who are being ruled are not capable enough to support their life by their own. 
Britishers had portrayed India as a country of snake charmers or a country of beggar. They forced the ex-ignorant world believe that India would have been collapsed without Britain Royalty. British argued that Indians are so much emotional and mentally ignorant that they can easily be fooled by evil forces. Larger part of global educated society then accepted this argument. It is even today widely discussed that British helped Indians become civilized.
This tactic is now being used by USA in Afghanistan, Somalia and Eastern Asia. They are helping these so called backward countries to get educated and civilized. Many including the citizen of these suffering countries are believing in this tactic even today! 

Isn't it trying to prove that we are condemned to be slave because we are uncivilized? Question is what is called civilized? If a society is disciplined, responsible and accountable as per the laws/norms created by the society itself than it should termed as civilized. The objective of being civilized is to live in harmony and search for the ever new knowledge, art and creativity. So if my dear readers are settled with this definition of 
civilization than lets discuss the next question. 
Next Question is weather or not was India civilized before British Invasion? Was Afghanistan not civilized before Taliban, Soviet or USA attack? Iraq? Korea? Somalia? Answer is complex if civility is mistaken from richness or properly dressing as the western way.

The problem 
Western World considers ex-colonial countries as Second World or Third World Nations. This is well planned positioning strategy of First World Nations that they portray themselves as a model of development and prosperity. Every other country follow them by falling the prey of such branding. This belief force them into a rat race of showbiz. This rat race is consuming so much natural resources that the world is exhausting beyond capacity. 7.1 billion humans are divided so unequally that they can never match the demand and supply of fulfilling their greed of materialistic comforts. We all are told that owning a car, fab dressings, big houses and speaking English are the parameters of being civilized. This implies that anyone who fails to fall in the above criteria is liable to enslaved. Afghan, Somalian, Iraqi, Korean are liable to be enslaved because they are not at par with the western standards. 

On the other hand, if barbarians, extremists and the group with weak tolerance capacity is allowed to live free, it will heavily upset the equilibrium. By above arguments it can be assumed that westerners are civilized. Yes others too are civilized but there are many radical groups which are cannibalistic and barbaric. They are too adamant to co-exist. 
When freedom is demanded or fought for, these extremists support the war of freedom but once it is achieved they misuse it. When someone raises objection they swear by the sacrifices they had made.

Why this situation arises?
Means should justify the Ends
Unfortunately this is not happening! The winning strategists compel everyone to fight for them by hook or crook but once they won they bow down to all their ethical and unethical demands. It finally creates another wall of injustice.
In all the future revolts, this generation should not compromise with the demands. Neither with the opponents nor with the allies. It should be determined that what ever will be the demands it will be reflected during the struggle. Any compromised means will not be tolerated because more than right, freedom is a responsibility. If irresponsibility is tolerated than freedom cannot be sustained.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My letter to Mr. Chetan Bhagat

Sent to bhakti@chetanbhagat.com  as on 26, August 2013, In response to Mr. Bhagat's Article  Sunday Times, 25th August 2013, Indore Edition  Dear Mr. Bhagat, This is awful that a person of your stature is out rightly supporting a cult publicly. Knowing that millions of youth will be influenced by your opinion, you should have behaved more responsibly in public. We know media is sold to Modi and international big brothers want to use Modi cult by giving rest to UPA for at least a term. For international diplomacy BJP & Congress are all alike. While these two national parties will keep wrestling over their core ideologies of being Hindu Nationalists & Secular Nationalists, they will always settle on the economic policies favoring to international markets. They will be ready to provide free flow accessibility of Indian consumers & natural resources to foreign corporate giants. It is sadly termed as a real growth of India. Because if foreign inve...

The Cusp of Democracy & Autocracy

A country where earning Rs.18 a day tags you not poor, Election Commission spends Rs.73 per voter to conduct the general election  - Jitendra Rajaram "O ut of 123 democratic countries in the world, not a single country is 100% democratic. Not a single democracy conducts 100% impartial election. In India where 36% population lives in a $1 a day, the cost of election is more than $1 a vote. The irony doesn't end here! The political parties conesting in such elections have spent more $13 to woo every single elector in 2019 General Election of India. Owing the amount of money spent, should we call it a democracy or plutocracy? Nic Cheeseman and Brian Klass wrote in the first page of their book “How to Rig an Election” with a statement “The greatest political paradox of our time is this: there are more elections than ever before, and yet the world is becoming less democratic”. The book written by Nic Cheeseman & Brian Klass, Harper Collins Publication | Yale Univers...

Theocracy Strengthens Aristocracy and Defies Democracy.

"It was easy in ancient time for religions to progress for two reasons. One every civilization was miles apart from every other civilization" - Jitendra Rajaram   "T he mixture of fear and weakness among the people who surrenders to feudalism has enlarged the idea of God-ism. The theory first coined by the power hungry ruling class and their serfs. People, when united, are the ultimate power. The select few (ruling class) always wanted to control this power of people. The control of power is all about channelizing the energy it holds. This is how the need of an imaginary superpower evolved. A superpower which can channelize the energy of united people. Ruling class invented this imaginary power to tame the real power (i.e. people).  Had I ONLY been introduced to anyone of Brahma or Allah or Moses or Christ during my childhood I would have easily believed upon god. The creators of God (i.e. Ruling Class) have devised so circumventing methods to establish...