J. Rajaram

The Idea of India never born, it was only conceived. It died well before the coming of labour pain in 1948. The next what happened is what Oxymoron Hindu widely believed about 'Ravana'. They killed him once but they burn its effigy every year; so that they can keep the trauma alive. They celebrate the hypocritical claim that   Golden State of Lanka   was bad and   Dhobis-Idea of Rama Rajya   was great. In 1948 the exact replica of Ramayana happened again! They killed Gandhi, who was endorsing Rama Rajya, and advocated that his assassin Nathuram Ghodse did it for the people. Now the Ghodse is new holy man they want to cheer for. Like they praised Ravana they praise Gandhi and like they revere Ram they revere Ghodse. Well forget Ghodse Ram reverence, here I am trying to explain how wilfully ‘The Idea of India’ was a stillborn. No wonder why no one cries over its corpse. Jawaharlal Nehru once said to Jahangir Tata " Don't use the word profit Jer, I hate that word ...

My views and my ethics “I believe water, land and air should not be traded. I believe cultural assets should be protected. I wish every human should get fair opportunities, risks, threats and strengths. Those who’re left behind should be pulled along. Those who went too ahead should be pushed behind so that resources can be shared equally and in ratio of the requirement” By Jitendra Rajaram (Author), jitendrarajaram@gmail.com I think a nation witnessed bloodbath at the time of freedom, a nation surrounded by its own bifurcated states with ever intensifying tensions needs transparent, public winning and democratic means of administration. This is exactly what Nehru designed as the new India. A nation where people had divine love to their leader had people who hated him too. The small chunk of people who were scared of public anger because they exploited them for thousands of years never wanted the people to become powerful. When they failed to stop democracy, they ass...

The Industry of War Indian partisan brought conflicts of Kashmir Issue, Eastern Pakistan, McMohan Line, and Special States along with it... These conflicts necessitated the accumulation of arms and display of it. By Jitendra Rajaram C onflicts are profitable. It just kills benign people, poor soldiers and turns million’s life miserable but it brings sacks of money in the banks of politicians, businessman and militia. States, no matter how democratic, wants to carry on one or more arms based conflicts in their territories. It yields in multiple ways in the favor of statesmen. By crying loud about these conflicts they provoke national sentiments which enflames citizen’s desire for solution. These cries create the perception of heroes for the statesman. The tribes/people of conflicting warzones fighting for their rights becomes terrorists in the eyes of common man. This perception develops a national sentiment which validates defense expenditure. I.e. for every billion dollar sp...