J. Rajaram

  “यस्मिन् जीवति जीवन्ति बहव: स तु जीवति”   पंचतंत्र का उपदेश है की “यदि व्यक्ति का जीवन और व्यक्तियों का जीवन संवारता है तभी वह व्यक्ति सच में जीवित है” क्या हमारे पुरखों का दिया ये अलौकिक ज्ञान आज कहीं भी चरितार्थ होता दिख रहा है ? अगर नहीं तो हो रहे बलात्कार और हिंसा के हम भी भागीदार है | “टी वी खबरों में , अख़बारों में , सोशल मीडिया में और आपसी लफ्फाजी में दुनिया के क्रूरतम होते जाने की निंदा कर देने भर से हमारे बच्चों का भविष्य सुरक्षित नहीं होने वाला | इस क्रूरता के खात्मे के लिए हमें अपनी न्यूनतम और अधिकतम योगदान को तय करना होगा | और तय किये हुए कार्य को करना भी होगा | पिछले लेख ( यहाँ पढ़ें ) में मैंने न्यूनतम प्रतिबद्धता की बात की थी | उस लेख पर सवाल खड़े हुए कि कैसे मात्र गाली नहीं देने से बलात्कार रुक जायेगा ? गाली के उन्मूलन मात्र से बलात्कार कम हो जायेंगे , ऐसा नहीं है | लेकिन ये बलात्कार को रोकने के लिए सबसे मौलिक और जरुरी कदम है | सच है की एक पत्थर मार देने से तिलस्म नहीं टूटेगा लेकिन जबतक पत्थर नहीं मरेंगे तबतक तो बिलकुल नहीं टूटेगा ...

The Idea of India never born, it was only conceived. It died well before the coming of labour pain in 1948. The next what happened is what Oxymoron Hindu widely believed about 'Ravana'. They killed him once but they burn its effigy every year; so that they can keep the trauma alive. They celebrate the hypocritical claim that   Golden State of Lanka   was bad and   Dhobis-Idea of Rama Rajya   was great. In 1948 the exact replica of Ramayana happened again! They killed Gandhi, who was endorsing Rama Rajya, and advocated that his assassin Nathuram Ghodse did it for the people. Now the Ghodse is new holy man they want to cheer for. Like they praised Ravana they praise Gandhi and like they revere Ram they revere Ghodse. Well forget Ghodse Ram reverence, here I am trying to explain how wilfully ‘The Idea of India’ was a stillborn. No wonder why no one cries over its corpse. Jawaharlal Nehru once said to Jahangir Tata " Don't use the word profit Jer, I hate that word ...

The Industry of War Indian partisan brought conflicts of Kashmir Issue, Eastern Pakistan, McMohan Line, and Special States along with it... These conflicts necessitated the accumulation of arms and display of it. By Jitendra Rajaram C onflicts are profitable. It just kills benign people, poor soldiers and turns million’s life miserable but it brings sacks of money in the banks of politicians, businessman and militia. States, no matter how democratic, wants to carry on one or more arms based conflicts in their territories. It yields in multiple ways in the favor of statesmen. By crying loud about these conflicts they provoke national sentiments which enflames citizen’s desire for solution. These cries create the perception of heroes for the statesman. The tribes/people of conflicting warzones fighting for their rights becomes terrorists in the eyes of common man. This perception develops a national sentiment which validates defense expenditure. I.e. for every billion dollar sp...